Monday, August 16, 2010

Spacewalk wrapping up; not enough time for shuttle-related task

Two NASA spacewalkers are getting ready to head back inside the International Space Station after successfully completing a three-spacewalk effort to replace a failed coolant pump.

But managers decided to forgo plans to tackle one more job that would have helped prepare for shuttle Discovery's arrival in November, concerned that it might keep Doug Wheelock and Tracy Caldwell Dyson outside dangerously long.

"We're going to call it a victory" and leave that task for later, Oscar Koehler, a spacewalk officer in Houston, radioed to the spacewalkers.

The decision was made about seven hours into a spacewalk that was scheduled to last six-and-a-half hours.

Wheelock and Caldwell Dyson had reported their condition as "Alpha," meaning they felt great. But it took them longer than expected to clean up from the higher priority tasks.

The key "consumable" being watched was the ability of spacesuits' metal oxide canisters to scrub carbon dioxide exhaled by the crew members.

Another spacewalk is likely to be scheduled before the shuttle mission to route a power extension cable between modules. NASA also wants to move the failed ammonia pump from a temporary storage location to a pallet where spare parts are stored.

2 comments:

  1. Anonymous2:01 PM

    With a failure like this can you see why we need to go back to the moon for exploration and the time to learn how to exist out there without going directly to mars where NO RESCUE parts will be available! Ares Constellation made sense ,One reason the moon is almost unexplored and it has water on it that can be used .Its still a big step but direct Mars is more like a step off a cliff.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous8:17 AM

    As to going back to the moon, I am still in a quandry as to why we did not go back for forty years and now suddenly, there are many nations in a new "race" to get there. If our failure to return related to Niel Armstrong's comments that we were
    "warned off" from returning, why are they all intent on going now? Did we suddenly get the "all clear" to return? The original claim was budgetary; that we could not afford it, but the economy is even worse today than then, so why are we going anywhere? (Mars, Moon, Asteroid...)

    ReplyDelete